4 Critical Reasons the 50mm Lens is NOT the ONLY Lens You’ll Ever Need

50 mm lens

This blog post may contain affiliate links.  We may earn a small commission for any purchases made through these links. Click here for the disclosure statement.


Just google “50mm lens” and you’ll be flooded with blog posts on how the great and wonderful nifty 50 is the only lens you’ll ever need. Believing the hype I bought one, and immediately noticed the weaknesses no one ever talks about. Don’t get me wrong, the nifty 50 is truly a great lens: it’s lightweight, has a large aperture, and is affordable. It’s the first lens I recommend to new photographers, but it’s not the ONLY lens you’ll ever need.

Lenses excel at their specific purposes and there is no one lens to rule them all. I would describe the 50mm lens as the jack of all trades, master of none. There are pros can cons to to the 50mm lens; it does a pretty good job in a variety of settings, but here are 4 reasons the 50mm lens is not the best lens for all of your photography needs.

1. It’s Not A Wide Angle Lens

My 50mm prime lens had arrived just in time for my trip to Sedona and Page, AZ. Imagine my disappointment when my 50mm lens was not wide enough to capture all of Horseshoe Bend. Landscapes are vast and wide and you need a lens that has the flexibility to capture it all, therefore a 50mm prime lens is not ideal for landscape photography

This photo was taken with a 50mm lens and was all we could capture of Horseshoe Bend in one shot. The only way to get all of the Horseshoe Bend with a 50mm lens is to do a panorama.
Compare that to this photo by Quentin Dr which was taken at a 10mm focal length. You can capture so much more in a single shot.

2. Large Minimum Focusing Distance

The minimum focusing distance is how close you can get to a subject and still be able to focus. The 50mm lens’s focusing distance is 0.46 m, which translates to about 18 inches. In comparison, the Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Lens has a focusing distance of almost half that at 0.26 m (or 10 inches). In addition to smaller focusing distances, lenses designed for macro photography will have magnification which gives the appearance of being even more close. Notice in the two photos below how much closer I can get to the subject with a shorter focusing distance.

Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 II
Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Lens

3. It’s Not Particularly Sharp

Images are softer and pick up on less detail than other more expensive lenses. Depending on the photo this may not be noticeable, but if you’re trying to capture the fine detail of a subject you may be left with something to be desired. Let’s zoom in to the images from above and compare how much detail is preserved.

Notice the halo around the edges of the petals and how much detail is lost in the center

By comparison, everything is still sharp. The details are so fine you can even see the ant’s legs.

4. No Zoom Capabilities

There are many situations in which you cannot physically get closer to your subject and instead need to zoom in on the subject. But the 50mm lens is a prime lens, meaning there is only one focal length and cannot zoom. With this lens, you would not be able to zoom in at a concert, wildlife, or a sporting event.

These two photos were taken with a Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III zoom lens. I was able to go from a wide shot to close up in a matter of seconds. The 50mm lens would have been even wider than the photo on the left and I wouldn’t have been able to zoom in for the closeup.

I still think the 50mm lens is a great lens, it just may not meet all of your needs. Don’t be surprised when you start looking for other lenses to complete your photography bag.


PIN IT FOR LATER

4 Reason 50mm Lens

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.